Mollusca
Octopuses & relatives
Fig. 2.  Two post-reproductive and moribund male Humboldt squids Dosidicus gigas in Baja California being collected as food for captive green turtles (usually thought of as being seagrass-eaters)
Fig. 1.  Giant squid Onykia robusta caught in a trawl net off the coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia

For reasons of large body size, fast-moving predatory activities, large beak, relatively large brain, and an eye structure similar to that of humans, cephalopods rank among the most interesting of all marine invertebrates.  A considerable mythology has developed around them. The first authentic photos of a living giant squid Architeuthis were obtained only in 2005, and there are reports of other large deep sea-inhabiting squid species.  Only two octopus species are commonly encountered on the northern parts of the west coast of North America, the giant octopus¹ Enteroctopus dofleini and the smaller Octopus rubescens.  Two other species², Octopus bimaculoides and O. bimaculatus, occur only in southern California and Baja California. Their distributions overlap but not a lot is known of their ecological relationships. A deep-water octopus species Octopus californicus was discovered over a Century ago, but its habits are little known.   Several species of squids inhabit, or regularly visit or wash up on, west-coast shores, including the shallow-water Rossia pacifica, the oceanic squid Doryteuthis (Loligo) opalescens, and the deep-dwelling giant squid Onykia robusta(Fig. 1).  An increasingly common visitor to west-coast shores, including British Columbia and southern Alaska in summer and early autumn, is the feisty Humboldt squid Dosidicus gigas³ (Fig. 2), which likely follows incursions of warm-water northwards.  Modest fisheries for giant octopuses Enteroctopus dofleini exists in Alaska (landings of about 200 metric tonnes annually) and Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia. Capture of squids Doryteuthis opalescens represents the largest fishery in California, with over 100,000 metric tonnes being harvested annually.

NOTE¹ how “giant” is Enteroctopus dofleini? Specimens up to 40kg are commonly caught. The largest individual recorded anecdotally from northern British Columbia weighed in at 270kg with a tentacle spread of 9.7m (High, 1976)

NOTE² how related are the west-coast species? This is investigated for the four species mentioned here, with the addition of a deep-water Californian species Octopus californicus, by researchers at Simon Fraser University, BC.  DNA-sequencing suggests that O. bimaculoides and O. bimaculatus form their own clade, separate from a clade containing Enteroctopus dolfleini and O. californicus.   Octopus rubescens is separate from the others, but possibly more closely aligned with the southern California group (Sosa et al ,1995) 

NOTE³ up to a decade ago sightings of Humboldt squids were mostly restricted to Mexico and southern California.  However, since summer 2009 they have been seen on the west coast of Vancouver Island, BC and also in Alaskan waters.  Researchers at the Department of Fisheries, B.C. have recently attached telemetry devices to specimens caught off Vancouver Island, so further information on their movements may be forthcoming

Cosgrove & Sendall   1976   Unpubl. MS from RBC Museum, Victoria, British Columbia
High   1995   Mar Fish Rev 38: 17
Sosa et al.     Mol Phylogenetics & Evol 4 (2): 163
Fig. 1.  Left: Enterotopus n.sp. Note lateral mantle frill and papillae or “horns” above the eyes.
Right: Enteroctopus dolfleini. Note skin folds on ventral mantle and absence of papillae above the eyes. Other differences are discussed by the authors

In addition to the two northern octopus species mentioned above (E. dolfleini and O. rubescens), researchers from Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage have described a second large octopus similar to Enteroctopus dofleini.  Specimens of this new species are commonly caught in drag trawls and have probably been mistaken for E. dofleini for many decades. The new species has several morphological features separating it from E. dolfleini, including the presence of lateral mantle frills and absence of longitudinal mantle folds (Fig. 1).  Additionally, the new species has characteristic texturing of the mantle below the frill and has “horns” or papillae above the eyes. These features don’t seem like much of a difference, but genetic analyses (nucleotide sequences from microsatellites and a portion of the OCDE gene) done by the authors on skin swabs of the two morphs provide evidence for the presence of a novel sister clad that they call the frilled giant Pacific octopus, Enteroctopus n. sp.  Of 21 octopuses examined by the researchers from shrimp-pot by-catch, two-thirds are E. dolfleini, while one-third is the novel morph.

Hollenbeck & Scheel   2017   Amer Malacol Bull 35 (2): 134

ANIMATION of the snail's odyssey © Thomas Carefoot 2026
map used by the snail in A SNAIL'S ODYSSEY

To navigate through the ODYSSEY:

  • Select a TOPIC from the menu at the top of the screen
  • OR: play the animation to the left
  • OR: follow the snail's ODYSSEY by CLICKING on any X-marked invertebrate on the map above

Phylum Mollusca (lit. “soft” or “shellfish” L.)

Class Cephalopoda (lit. “head foot” G.), referring to the body structure of head lying directly overtop of the muscular foot (in cephalopods, the ancestral foot evolved into arms and tentacles)

SubClass Coleoidea (lit. “sheath” G.), including octopuses and squids

Order Sepiida (lit. “cuttlefish” G.), including the stubby squid Rossia pacifica

Order Teuthoidea (lit. “squid” G.), including several species of squids (however, it seems that this Order name is now invalid)

Order Myopsida (lit. "short-sighted appearance"?? G.) including Doryteuthis opalescens

Order Oegopsida (lit. "open appearance"? G.) including the Humboldt squid Dosidicus gigas and the giant squid Onykia robusta 

Order Octopoda (lit. “eight arms” L.), including the octopuses Enteroctopus dofleini, Octopus rubescens, O. bimaculatus and O. bimaculoides (the last two in California only)

NOTE:  for many years the taxonomy of Onykia robusta has been confused.  Those that have considered it a different species note that it is smaller than Onykia robusta and differs morphologically from the latter, but in only minor ways.  Recent molecular evidence suggests that the smaller form may be just an immature stage of the larger, and the suggestion by the authors of this latest study is that the species be known as Onykia robusta.  In fact, recent reference to WoRMS (World Register of Marine Species) shows that this proposed name has been accepted from June, 2016.  The parent genus Onykia dates back to 1821, so the species Onykia robusta is now confirmed

Wakabayashi et al.   2007   J Mar Biol Ass UK 87 (4): 959