
| Habitat & community ecology | ||||||
| Shell morphology & habitat | ||||||
| Topics in this diverse section include shell morphology & coloration, considered here, and SHORE-LEVEL SIZE GRADIENTS, AGENTS OF COMMUNITY STRUCTURE , and DEMOGRAPHY considered in other sections. | ||||||
NOTE the role of shell sculpturing in defense of whelks is considered elsewhere: PREDATORS & DEFENSES:SHELL SCULPTURING Different colour morphs of
This colorful whelk Nucella lamellosa has put on |
||||||
| West-coast whelks with notable shell ornamentation: | ||||||
|
||||||
Research study 1 |
||||||
Morphs from other localities ranging from Knight Island, Alaska to San Francisco Bay, California can be accessed by clicking on the numbered buttons on the map on the Right. Are all these morphs expressions of different genotypes, or simply phenotypic responses to different environments? The author addresses this question and proposes that the source of the variability in N. lamellosa is primarily genetic, maintained by geographic and even “microgeographic” isolation. Only size and, associated with this to some extent, degree of sculpturing3 , are thought by the author to be phenotypic expression of environmental differences, mainly in amount of food available and immersion time. Clearly, if some researcher has the patience and inclination for a long-term study doing extensive inter-population crosses and translocational growth studies, it would be a very interesting study, indeed. NOTE1 predominant colours in Nucella lamellosa, either solid or in bands, are purple, white, chocolate brown, yellow, and orange NOTE2 the book is written by Trevor Kincaid who, at its publication date in 1957, was an Emeritus Professor in the Department of Zoology at the University of Washington, Seattle. By its uniquely personal features, it is likely to have had a limited printing; hence, may not be available in many university libraries. Partly for this reason, over one-third of the 53 morphs of Nucella lamellosa described by Kincaid are reproduced here in the ODYSSEY. The morphs featured are selected for their widespread geographic location, specific habitats occupied, and overall diversity of shape and colour. However, all 12 morphs from San Juan Island are included to show the extent of variability in a relatively small geographic region NOTE3 in his book the author uses the term "imbrication" to express the degree of sculpturing. The word means ornamentation of overlapping tiles or scales, or a pattern resembling this. It is a good one and probably should be adopted by all authors describing this particular form of ornamentation or shell sculpturing in Nucella spp. It would replace the currently used terms "frills" and "fluting" presently commonly used for N. lamellosa, including in the ODYSSEY |
||||||
Research study 2 |
||||||
NOTE both sites are characterised as "calm-water"; no information is given on substratum types present |
||||||
Research study 3 |
||||||
Of the 3 species, Nucella ostrina has the lowest shell mass per unit of shell capacity (see graph on Right). It lives high in the intertidal zone in areas ranging from full wave exposure to considerable shelter. An examination of 477 N. ostrina from 9 sites in Barkley Sound show that shell form changes from short and broad on open-coast wave-exposed areas (Pachena Point), to tall and Nucella lamellosa is heavily armoured and inhabits low shore levels from moderate to extreme shelter. Armouring in this species may relate more to predation risk from crabs than from exposure to waves. Morphologies of N. lamellosa range from a thicker-shelled form in sedimented sheltered areas, to a more fluted form in rocky sheltered areas characterised by clean water (see graph and photographs on Left). Nucella canaliculata has a slightly |
||||||
Research study 4 |
||||||
NOTE the author defines shell shape in this paper as the ratio of length of shell to another ratio, length of shell divided by length of aperture (L/Ap). This gives a simple and quick method of assessing variability in shell shape in Nucella, which fulfills the aim of the study, but it does not provide information on width or diameter or, more importantly, on shell mass. This other information may have been useful for comparisons with results of other studies |
||||||
| RETURN TO TOP | ||||||