 |
 |
| |
Reproduction |
| |
 |
| |
Species that are poecilogonous |
| |
Tubeworm species that are poecilogonous are considered here, while
SPECIES THAT BROOD INSIDE OF TUBE,
SPECIES THAT BROOD OUTSIDE OF TUBE, and
SPECIES THAT BROADCAST GAMETES are considered in other sections. There is also a general section on LARVAE.
This section on poecilogonous tubeworms is separated into genera for convenience
NOTE lit. “varied offspring/reproduction” G. Poecilogony is usually defined as occurring in a single species, but has also been applied to an individual female in a species. More information on peocilogony can be found in the ODYSSEY at LEARN ABOUT NUDIBRANCH: ALDERIA |
| |
 |
| |
Boccardia
|
| |

Research study 1 |
| |
The spionid worm Boccardia proboscidea is a common, tube-dwelling intertidal species in California that favours life amongst soft stones and within narrow rocky crevices. An early report on its reproduction describes the enclosure of 20-80 eggs within soft, cocoon-like capsules attached by double stalks within the adult’s tube. The author observes hatching of eggs and development to a 12-15 segmented stage that is active within the cocoon, with some cannibalism occurring (see drawing below), but these stages die before breaking out of the cocoon in this particular culture. If freed, however, the larger stages forage about for a time, then settle and build tubes. The author describes 3-15 segmented larvae as being common in the plankton in springtime. Hartman 1941 Allan Hancock Pacific Expedition 7: 299.
NOTE the author describes only one feature of its reproduction. Later reports indicate a poecilogonous, or variable type of reproduction, as described for another spionid species Streblospio benedicti in Research Study 2 below
Features of development: |
| |
|
| |

Research study 2 |
| |
A later study on Boccardia proboscidea by a researcher at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla confirms that this spionid actually has a poecilogonous1 type of development, that is, a female may produce planktotrophic larvae2, as described in Research Study 1 above, as well as bottom-crawling juveniles within a single egg capsule. Poecilogony occurs among broods in different females, or within a brood from a single female. Interestingly, the type of brood produced appears to be related to whether or not a female includes nurse eggs3 in the capsule. Females with a low proportion of nurse eggs (about 15%) have larvae that become free-living at a 3-5 setiger (= segment) stage, are planktotrophic, and settle after about 20d. However, females with a high proportion of nurses eggs (about 90%) have 2 types of offspring: ones that ingest nurse eggs, mature quickly, and hatch as crawling juveniles, and ones that are planktotrophic for about 30d before settling. Finally, females with few or no nurse eggs have larvae that break free of the capsules at a 3-setiger stage and are planktotrophic for 30d before settling. Adults of each type are morphologically similar, but consistently produce the same type of broods. Thus, there appear to be 3 developmental patterns within a single population. Reciprocal crosses of the last 2 developmental types described here yield interfertile offspring. This observation relates to the question raised by the author as to whether the 3 reproductive morphs described belong to a single species. Gibson 1997 Invert Biol 116 (3): 213.
NOTE1 poecilogony has apparently been reported before for this species, including in Research Study 1 above, but the present study is the first to describe 3 types of development in a single population
NOTE2 the author arbitrarily defines a larva as having 16 setigers or less, while a juvenile has 17-45 setigers and a mature has more than 45 setigers. Larvae feed on phytoplankton, while juveniles in the plankton feed on mixed algae and small zooplankters including invertebrate larvae
NOTE3 nurse eggs are non-viable eggs that are eaten by the other developing larvae, a behaviour termed adelphophagy |
| |

Research study 3 |
| |
In a later paper the author in association with research colleagues at Acadia University, Nova Scotia shows through molecular and morphological comparisons that Boccardia proboscidea is, indeed, a single species. Most of the genetic variance found is attributable to individual differences and to variation between geographic regions. There is no significant genetic difference between the developmental morphs. Similarly, although there is some morphological differences between geographic areas, no major differences are disclosed between reproductive morphs. The authors conclude that B. proboscidea is a single, poecilogonous species. Gibson et al. 1999 Mar Biol 134: 743.
NOTE DNA amplification by RAPD-PCR technique. Morphological comparisons are done using bright-field and scanning-electron microscopical techniques
Head end of female Boccardia proboscea with planktotrophic
development showing feeding palp and segments |
| |

Research study 4 |
| |
A recent genetics study done by a consortium of researchers on Boccardia proboscidea throughout its west-coast distribution supports the view that it is a single species with 3 different reproductive strategies. Its genetic makeup, however, is interrupted by a putative break at Point Conception, California creating 2 groups, a larger, more genetically homogeneous northern group, and a smaller, more heterogeneous southern group. The northernmost worms have just a single mode of reproduction, involving nurse eggs and hatching at an advanced larvae or crawl-away juveniles, while the southernmost ones have all 3 reproductive modes. Other findings from the study are that higher latitude females supply their offspring with more extra-embryonic nutrition (nurse eggs) than do comparably reproducing southern females, and brood for a significantly longer time. Observations on worms in culture show, among other things, that the females play an active role in brooding of the offspring, a behaviour noted in previous studies. Not only do they clean and ventilate the egg cases, but they liberate the embryos from their cases. Oyarzun et al. 2011 Evolution & Development 13 (6): 489.
NOTE the researchers use 2 mitochondrial markers 16S rDNA and Cyt b as well as some interbreeding experiments |
| |
 |
| |
Streblospio |
| |

Research study 3 |
| |
Streblospio benedicti is a small (10-20mm) tube-inhabiting spionid that lives close to the sediment-water interface. It both suspension-feeds and deposit-feeds. It is common on both sides of the North American continent and, on the west coast, inhabits beaches from southern California to at least southern British Columbia. Interestingly, on the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts its reproduction involves planktotrophic larvae, while on the Pacific coast the larvae are entirely lecithotrophic. The presence of multiple reproductive modes in a species is known as poecilogony. In planktotrophic forms the females produce many small eggs (100-500 at 70-90µm), which they brood in paired dorso-lateral pouches and release as larvae at the 3- to 7-setiger stage of development. The larvae bear long setae and feed for several weeks in the plankton before settling at the 9-setiger stage. These planktotrophic larvae are strong swimmers and exhibit positive phototaxis. In contrast, the lecithotrophic forms produce a few large eggs (10-50 at 100-200µm diameter) that are brooded in dorsal pouches for about a week (in culture at 20oC). The larvae are released at the 9- to 12-setiger stage, with ample yolk supply, and are competent to settle immediately. However, in the absence of suitable substratum they may remain planktonic for several days, subsisting on their yolk. The author describes cross-breeding experiments that show that the planktotrophic and lecithotrophic forms of S. benedicti are not reproductively isolated and thus do not merit separate species status. Levin 1984 Biol Bull 166: 494; see also Schulze et al. 2000 Evolution 54: 1247 for a discussion of the evolution of poecilogony and evolution of Streblospio spp.
NOTE mispelled "poicilogony" in the paper
NOTE “setiger” is a segment that bears setae. Similar terminology is a "chaetiger", referring to a segment that bears chaetae |
| |
|
| |
RETURN TO TOP |