![]() |
| ||||||
| Habitats & Ecology | |||||||
| Included in this section is the topic of chimneys, while GROWTH & GROWTH FORMS and GLASS-SPONGE REEFS are considered elsewhere. | |||||||
| Chimneys | |||||||
|
|||||||
Research study 1 |
|||||||
NOTE the genus, formerly Microciona, includes several species of small marine demosponges, some found in the low intertidal region
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
| Conditions for growth are good in each treatment and, within a week, the sponges grow larger with the chimneys growing in the orientations shown. The chimneys in the current treatments have grown in the direction of the current, while the chimneys in the still-water treatments have grown straight up. | ![]() |
||||||
![]() |
|||||||
| We now move half the slides from each treatment to the other treatment. A few days later, we see that the growth in the transplants is consistent with the patterns observed initially in the two treatments. | Specimens from the current treatment now grow with their chimneys
straight up |
||||||
Specimens from the still-water treatment now grow with their chimneys
bent in the direction of the current |
|||||||
|
|||||||
What other explanations might there be for our results? – ones perhaps unrelated to what we initially had hoped to show? Think about this for a moment and compare your idea(s) to the two listed here. 1. What if the actual force of the current is bending the chimneys, through pressure drag or frictional drag? Thus, the new growth of the chimneys may be simply be a streamlining tendency on the part of the sponge and not related to water re-entering the sponge’s incurrent pores. This is good “lateral” thinking, something that is lacking in the original publication. 2. If your idea is that bacterial food taken in on the upstream side of the sponge and the subsequent growth from that side may have caused the chimneys to bend in the downstream direction, then you are thinking creatively. So, the bending may have had nothing to do with our original hypothesis about used water re-entering the incurrent pores. NOTE these two forces, pressure drag and frictional drag, come into play when any object moves through a fluid medium, whether air or water, or when fluid passes by an object. Pressure drag comes from the mass of fluid being displaced as it passes around an object, in this case, the sponge’s chimney. The displacement creates an area of negative pressure behind the object and the pressure of the fluid pushes the object into it. The second force, frictional drag, is the frictional resistance of molecules of the fluid moving past the object – the resistance pulls the object in the direction of the moving fluid. Confused? Think of walking into a wind. The two drag forces combine to impede your forward movement, with the frictional part being visually manifested by rippling of your clothing. If you are swimming, the forces are much greater because of greater density of the fluid. Here, pressure drag comes into play with the mass of water that has to be displaced with each swimming stroke, and frictional drag with the resistance to water molecules passing along the surface of your skin. Nothing can be done about pressure drag when swimming, but frictional drag can be lessened by streamlining...such as a full-body Speedo seamless suit, or removal of body hair |
|||||||
|
|||||||
| RETURN TO TOP | |||||||