![]() |
| ||
| Defenses | |||
| Secondary metabolites | |||
Defenses of nudibranchs and their relatives include secondary metabolites, considered in this section, and Over the last few decades a rich literature1 on the chemistry of potentially defensive secondary metabolites2 in nudibranchs has emerged, and many reports pertain to west-coast species, mainly owing to a strong research focus in labs in California and British Columbia. Much of this information is just a record of “interesting chemistry”, but there are a number of publications with toxicity bioassays or environmental connotations worth considering here. "Skin chemistry" is a feature of dorids, mostly relating to diets of sponges with their inherent toxicity. No aeolids3 contain such secondary metabolites. Thus far, about 30 species of dorids are known to possess secondary metabolites, but few experiments have been done on possible defensive functions. More dorid species would likely be identified, were it not for the problem of obtaining enough specimens for extractions and analyses. Unfortunately, there are no reliable data on the number of dorids without skin chemistry. Clearly, such data would be of inestimable interest, especially if the chemistry of the diets were also known. The entries below are listed alphabetically by genus. NOTE1 for more information readers are directed to reviews by Proksch 1994 Toxicon 32: 639; Cimino & Ghiselin 1998 Chemoecology 8: 51; Cimino & Ghiselin 1999 Chemoecology 9: 187; Andersen et al. 2006 p. 277 In, Progress in molecular and subcellular biology Subseries: Marine molecular biotechnology (Cimino & Gavagnin, eds.): Molluscs Springer-Verlag, Berlin; and Cimino & Ghiselin 2009 Proc Calif Acad Sci 60: 175 (this last is a useful compendium of current knowledge of chemical defenses in world opisthobranch species. It deals not just with details of defensive chemistry, but also with how the chemistry has influenced opisthobranch evolution) NOTE2 these are organic compounds of restricted distribution among certain taxa, with no obvious metabolic function and, for this reason, with an often presumed defensive role NOTE3 Melibe leonina, an aeolid, has repugnatorial glands that release a noxious secretion, but skin chemistry as such is lacking |
|||
|
|||
Research study 1 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Research study 1 |
|||
Analysis of the sponge-eating dorid Aldisa sanguinea from Barkley Sound, British Columbia reveals the presence of 2 related steroidal ketones that may have anti-feedant properties. |
|||
Aplysia |
|||
Research study 1 |
|||
NOTE in the case of 10 sea hares removed from anemone digestive tracts, digestion amounts to about 70% of body mass, but in no cases are the digestive glands attacked NOTE obtained by water- and acetone-extraction of the digestive gland. Apparently, a similar type of toxin is present in both A. californica and A. vaccaria |
|||
Research study 2 |
|||
NOTE bromine was earlier implicated in the defenses of sea hares through work by Japanese scientists on Aplysia kurodai. It was these researchers who coined the term aplysin, but apparently not for the cholinergic agent described in Research Study 1 above. A previous search for the source of the organic bromides in the red-algal food of A. californica, namely, Plocamium pacificum, was unsuccessful. NOTE the data for each body part are presented as % bromine and % lipid of the total found in that body part. As not all body parts are included, the totals may fall short of 100% |
|||
Research study 3 |
|||
Analyses of digestive-gland constituents of Aplysia californica at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California reveal the presence of several halogenated natural products derived from metabolites of the red alga Laurencia pacifica, one of the preferred foodstuffs of the sea hare. Additionally, the researchers identify 2 new halogenated monoterpenes derived from another preferred food of A. californica, the red alga Plocamium coccineum var. pacificum. The authors speculate that the digestive gland may be used to store algal metabolites used in a chemical defense system, but how the substances are mobilised is, at the time, unknown. NOTE these are aplysin, debromoaplysin, laurinterol, pacifenol, johnstonol, and pacifidiene, all previously isolated and named from studies on other Aplysia species and from analyses of seaweed foods of these particular sea hares |
|||
Research study 4 |
|||
A companion study at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla by these same researchers on digestive-gland constituents in Aplysia californica starts with the questions: 1) is the digestive gland used solely for storage of toxic chemicals to be employed in defense, and 2) does the digestive gland chemically transform these toxic substances? The answer turns out to be a little of both, as chemicals are stored there and they also undergo transformation. The authors report that 2 algal metabolites derived from the preferred diets of red algae Laurencia pacifica and Plocamium coccineum var. pacificum, namely, laurinterol and pacifenol, undergo transformations to aplysin and pacifidiene, respectively, in the digestive gland. |
|||
Research study 5 |
|||
A comparative study on the location of sequestered secondary metabolites in 3 anaspid opisthobranchs, including the sea hare Aplysia californica, shows that the compounds are almost exclusively stored in the digestive glands, and not in skin, ink, or eggs. The authors remark on the counterintuitive nature of the results, in that skin and eggs would be ones first encountered by a potential predator, and ink would allow predators to taste and reject the prey without causing it mortal damage. The metabolites are found in and sequestered from the Aplysia’s natural diet of red algae. The principal metabolite identified in the ink of Aplysia is the same monoterpene as found in the digestive gland. Overall, the authors conclude that the sequestered compounds in A. californica and in the other anaspids studied are not located primarily for defense. This is an interesting idea and certainly warrents further research. NOTE 2 of the species Stylocheilus longicauda and Dolabella auriularia are tropical, and will not be dealt with here. The sea hare species A. californica is collected at Santa Catalina Island, California NOTE the primary metabolite found in the preferred algal food Plocamium spp. is a halogenated monoterpene which, at the time of the study, had not yet been specifically identified |
|||
|
|||
Research study 1 |
|||
NOTE the characteristic fruity odour of C. luteomarginata has been identified in British Columbia specimens as luteone, a 23-carbon terpenoid. |
|||
Research study 2 |
|||
Several terpenoids, including cadlinolide A, and glaciolide (a degraded diterpenoid), have been isolated from skin extracts of Cadlina luteomarginata feeding on the sponge Aplysilla glacialis, and are identified as being the same as, or derived from related compounds, in the sponge. NOTE another terpenoid, marginatafuran, has additionally been isolated from specimens of C. luteomarginata collected in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, also possibly derived from sponge food. |
|||
Research study 3 |
|||
Two new sesquiterpenoids, acanthene A and acanthene B have been isolated from the marine sponge Acanthella collected at Graham Island, British Columbia. Further, an analogue of these 2 substances, acanthene C, has been identified in Cadlina luteomarginata, which feeds on Acanthella. |
|||
Research study 4 |
|||
Other studies on distributions of terpenoids in Cadlina luteomarginata from populations in British Columbia and California show that endogenous concentrations vary inversely with the availability of structurally similar compounds in their foods. This suggests that Cadlina regulates its de novo biosynthesis of defensive compounds according to need. Based on the assumption that sequestration of terpenoids and other (defensive?) compounds from the diet is more primitive than de novo biosynthesis of the same compounds, the authors place C. luteomarginata, which does both, in an intermediate position in the evolution of nudibranch chemical defenses. |
|||
Research study 5 |
|||
|
|||
Research study 6 |
|||
Test of function of supposed chemical defenses in an animal, whether vertebrate or invertebrate, marine or terrestrial, is difficult, mainly owing to lack of knowledge of natural predators and to lack of suitable controls. If a predator is confronted with a nudibranch and doesn’t attack, or attacks and doesn’t eat, the reason may be unrelated to presence of purported chemical defenses. There could be physical reasons for unpalatability such as spines or thick integument, or a failure to recognise the nudibranch is a potential prey, or satiation of the predator from an earlier meal. The difficulty of interpreting results of such predator/prey experiments is exemplified in a study of Cadlina luteomarginalis at Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre, British Columbia. As we have seen, Cadlina has a well-characterised “secondary chemistry” in the form of various terpenoids, thought to be defensive but never rigorously tested. Predators used in the experiment include crabs Cancer spp. that cut and crush their prey, and kelp-greenling fishes Hexagrammos decagrammus, sea stars Pycnopodia helianthoides, and sea anemones Anthopleura elegantissima, that mouth and swallow their prey. The predators are kept under laboratory conditions for 1wk and fed bits of squid at regular intervals to accustom them to accepting food, but are not given enough to satiate them. Half the trials involve presenting squid bits first, followed by Cadlina individuals, with the order reversed in the other half of the trials. Predators that do not eat the control bits of squid are discarded. Out of approximately 50 trials, only 1 Cadlina is eaten. Many of the test nudibranchs are wounded during the feeding trials, but recovery (except when they are partially digested) is good over a subsequent week’s recuperation time. The author concludes that C. luteomarginata is effectively defended against a range of predators with different feeding modes. NOTE 48 predators (approximately 10 of each species) are each tested once with a piece of squid (known to be edible) and once with Cadlina (hypothesised to be inedible) |
|||
Research study 7 |
|||
| But what does this really tell us about the efficacy of chemical defenses in nudibranchs? The results are certainly suggestive, but by no means are they a confident rejection of the null hypothesis. What is missing, of course, is a control – a set of Cadlina luteomarginata, identical in all respects to the ones tested, but lacking terpenoid or other purported chemical defenses. For a nudibranch species other than C. luteomarginata, this is not as far-fetched as it may seem, because it may be possible to feed post-metamorphic individuals on food lacking in terpenoids or precursor compounds and produce a “secondary chemistry”-free test subject. This would not be possible with Cadlina, however, as it is known that in the absence of diet-derived terpenoids or terpenoid precursors it has the capability for de novo synthesis of the secondary metabolites. In a similar way, nematocyst-free aeolids have been produced for other types of study, but not in west-coast species, and this certainly would seem a worthwhile research enterprise. | |||
|
|||
Research study 1 |
|||
Extraction of whole bodies of Diaulula sandiegensis collected at Point Loma, California reveals the presence of 9 chlorinated acetylenes, any or all of which may be involved in chemical defense. |
|||
Research study 2 |
|||
Whole-body extracts of specimens of Diaulula sandiegensis from British Columbia contain steroids, diaulusterol A and diaulusterol B. This differs from 9 chlorinated acetylenes previously reported for another dorid species D. sandiegensis collected at Point Loma, California. In both localities sponges comprise the main dietary component and the authors conclude that the difference in skin chemistry is a consequence of eating different sponge diets at the 2 sites. At the time the work was published the actual sponges being eaten by Discodoris had not been identified. NOTE extraction procedure involves immediately immersing freshly collected specimens in methanol for several days. Speed is essential because many nudibranchs lose their chemicals quickly, perhaps from handling which may mimic attack from a predator or other animall. No mention is made in these Research Studies on Diaulula of cleaning out gut contents (including digestive glands), or in other similar studies on skin chemistry of nudibranchs, for that matter, and one wonders if there is any significant contribution from residual sponge food in the gut system to the overall results NOTE a later study by the same research group shows that the polyketide fragment of diaulusterol are actually synthesised de novo in Diaulula sandiegensis collected at various sites in British Columbia. The authors note that the ability to make these potentially defensive chemicals, known as allomones, should increase the range of habitats available to a species by eliminating its dietary dependence on prey rich in the required secondary metabolite(s). |
|||
|
|||
Research study 1 |
|||
Doris montereyensis (?) 1X
|
|||
Research study 2 |
|||
NOTE these contain drimenoic acid glyceride and glyceryl ether
|
|||
Research study 3 |
|||
Nudibranchs with potentially defensive metabolites either get them from their foods or synthesise them. Determination of the latter is often a complex business, requiring that a labelled precursor substance be injected in order to obtain an identifiable secondary metabolite. A simpler method, as proposed by the authors of a study using nudibranchs collected at several west-coast sites, is to see if a nudibranch in question exhibits considerable variation in their chemical constituents. If so, they undoubtedly obtain these chemicals from dietary sources. Conversely, if the chemicals are the same wherever they are collected, the species is most likely capable of de novo synthesis. Let’s see how this might work with 2 common sponge-eating species, selected from several examples cited by the authors. Doris montereyensis at La Jolla, California contain as their major component agathanori acid glycerides, identical to what is contained in specimens from Barkley Sound, British Columbia and elsewhere. Individuals of this species always contain the same specific array of metabolites no matter where or when they are collected, suggesting identical biosynthetic pathways. Barkley Sound, British Columbia: 5 types of sesquiterpenes As to whether one strategy has an advantage over the other, the authors simply note that any advantage of not being dependent on specific food sources for defensive metabolites is balanced against the need to maintain a complex biosynthetic mechanism. Photo courtesy Jeff Goddard, Santa Barbara. Cadlina luteomarginata 1.3X |
|||
Research study 4 |
|||
In considering the results of the chemical-deterrent part of the study, the author notes the potential pitfalls in using 1-factor studies of chemical3 defense. For example, if a chemical is added to a high-quality food (e.g., one that is more nutritious or even more tasty) it may have less apparent deterrence than if it were added to a low-quality food. Additionally and obviously, chemicals do not act in isolation, and this must be factored into deterrence-assessment experiments. The literature on the subject of marine chemical defense is voluminous, especially relating to seaweeds, sponges, gorgonians and, especially, nudibranchs. NOTE1 two artificial foods are created, one with 12% dry mass organic content to mimic the organic content of spiculated dorid nudibranchs (intended as a "low" quality food), the other with 22% dry mass organic content (a "high" quality food). One-half the pellets is treated with methanol extract of dried A. montereyensis before being set in alginate gel (WITH EXTRACT); the other half is treated only with methanol solvent as a WITHOUT EXTRACT control. Low nutritional content of an opisthobranch as a "defense" is considered elsewhere in the ODYSSEY: DEFENSES AGAINST PREDATORS: NUTRITIONAL CONTENT NOTE2 at concentrations matching those found naturally in the bodies of the nudibranch NOTE3 the author does not consider possible diffusion or degradative losses of the extracted chemicals during the trials (lasting up to a day), perhaps because these are likely to be small owing to low water-solubility of the chemicals. Even if losses do occur, strong significance is shown in any case in the statistical tests |
|||
|
|||
Research study 1 |
|||
NOTE a small pear-shaped citrus fruit Citrus aurantium from Italy whose peel yields an aromatic oil used in perfumes, tea, and aromatherapy |
|||
Research study 2 |
|||
Tests in which glass rods are stroked over the bodies and cerata of Melibe and then touched to arms of sunflower stars Pycnopodia helianthoides result in the sea stars curling the arms upwards and towards the central disc. NOTE clean (control) rods also elicit arm responses, but are much weaker in intensity |
|||
Research study 3 |
|||
| Analysis of skin extracts of Melibe leonina collected near the University of British Columbia reveal 2 degraded monoterpenes, one of which (the aldehyde, 2,6-dimethyl-5-heptenal) is responsible for the fragrant odour of the animals. The odour is so distinctive it can be discerned by SCUBA-divers collecting Melibe in a kelp bed (densities about 50 individuals . m-2). Tests of toxicity of the extracts on goldfish are inconclusive. | |||
Research study 4 |
|||
Application of seawater filtrate of ground-up tube feet of Pycnopodia to test Melibe, however, fails to elicit discharge of the substance. Feeding tests with cottid and gobiid fishes, more likely to be predators of Melibe than sea stars (owing to their habitat of living in kelp plants) result in rejection of test pieces of Melibe cerata. Each gland comprises several secretory cells connected to a duct opening via a pore on the skin surface. The glands are readily visible as tiny opaque spots (about 100µm diameter) in the translucent body wall, and are most abundant on the cerata and dorsal surface of the oral hood. The secretory cells contain large vacuoles that function as reservoirs. A complex array of striated muscles squeezes the cells to force out their contents. The gland is supplied with nerves leading to the muscles and to mechanoreceptor-type ciliated sensory cells surrounding the pore. The glands discharge a ropy, sticky secretion when the overlying epidermis is touched. On filter paper the secretion has the fruity odour typical of a physically disturbed Melibe. Two types of cells comprise the main secretory component of the gland, and these are thought by the author to release defensive chemical and mucin, respectively. |
|||
Research study 5 |
|||
Experiments on Melibe leonina collected from Bowen Island, British Columbia show that the characteristic fruity odour originates from the epidermal repugnatorial glands. The substance is identified as a degraded terpenoid 2,6-dimethyl-5-heptenal, and is made by the nudibranch via de novo biosynthesis. |
|||
|
|||
Research study 1 |
|||
|
|||
Research study 2 |
|||
| Peltodoris nobilis in Monterey Bay, California, in addition to eating several species of sponges, also eat detritus about half the time. Analysis of digestive-gland extracts from Peltodoris reveals the presence of doridosine when the animals are eating sponges. However, when they eat detritus, certain chemicals that the author calls “histamine”, normally present in the sponges, disappear from the digestive-gland extracts. Thus, the pharmacological properties of the extracts change depending upon where the nudibranchs are collected. Interestingly, different individuals of Peltodoris display different preferences for sponge species to eat. In its wanderings, one individual will bypass several sponge species to get to another, while another individual will make its own different selection. Interference competition appears not to be involved; however, the author suggests that it may be a form of resource partitioning. Somewhat paradoxically, exposure to physiological doses of extracts from sponges normally eaten causes Peltodoris to flee, while exposure to extracts from sponges not normally eaten causes violent spasms, increased mucus production, and sometimes death in the nudibranchs. Clearly, further research is needed on this interesting subject. | |||
|
|||
Research study 1 |
|||
Shown here: the related Polycera atra, which |
|||
|
|||
Research study 1 |
|||
Tochuina tetraquetra eating the
|
|||
Triopha |
|||
Research study 1 |
|||
|
|||
| RETURN TO TOP | |||