![]() |
| ||
| Ecology | |||
Chitons are sluggish and only slowly responsive. For these reasons their ecology has not excited the same research interest as that of other molluscs. |
|||
| Habitat preferences and role as herbivores | |||
| Topics of interest in the ecology of chitons include their role as herbivores, considered here, and ORIENTATION & HOMING, GENETIC PATTERNS, and COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS, considered in other sections. | |||
Research study 1 |
|||
A study on herbivores of the red alga Mazzaella splendens in Oregon also includes grazing activity of the black-leather chiton Katharina tunicata. Removal of all Katharina from intertidal rocky benches leads to re-establishment of Mazzaella in areas where it was previously absent, and removal of limpets Lottia NOTE formerly Iridaea cordata
|
|||
Research study 2 |
|||
There have been several studies on effects of chiton herbivory on mediating structure of west-coast intertidal communites. One of these, conducted in San Juan Island, Washington, concerns the role of herbivory by leather chitons Katharina tunicata1 in affecting competitive interactions between marine plants2. The authors create 3 types of treatment plots: chiton-removal3, CONTROL, and chiton-addition,
NOTE1 in the areas of San Juan Island selected for study, Katharina is the dominant herbivore, reaching densities of up to 100 . m-2 and sizes of 12cm length NOTE2 other plants, including crusts, diatoms, and surfgrass, are also monitored, but the data are less interesting than those for macroalgae and thus are not included here. The data set presented here represents "corticated macrophytes": Gigartina spp., Fucus spp., Rhodomela larix, Odonthalia spp., Botryoglossum sp., Plocamium sp., Iridaea spp., and other unidentified red species NOTE3 chitons that wander into the removal areas are cleared out every 4-5mo. This housekeeping maintains densities in the removal areas at about 8% of original, and in the addition area atabout 180% of original |
|||
Research study 3 |
|||
In comparison, effects of removal of chitons on kelps and other algae in Alaska are variable and not related to the presence or absence of Katharina. Note in the graph that while kelps increase in % cover in Alaska following removal of Katharina, they do so in both removal and control plots. The authors caution that the presence of a strong interaction in one area does not guarantee its presence in another, even if community composition is similar in the 2 regions. NOTE chiton densities are similar in the two areas, ranging from 21-57 individuals . m-2 NOTE replicate sites are cleared in each geographical area, but only results for one replicate are shown here |
|||
Research study 4 |
|||
By manipulating densities of Katharina in 3 types of experimental plots1, namely, low, CONTROL, and high densities2, and comparing survivorship of Hedophyllum in each, the researchers find that Katharina affects survival of both juvenile3 (<1cm holdfast diameter) and young adult (1-4cm) plants, but not of adult (>4cm) plants. Note in the histogram that Hedophyllum densities decline in all treatment groups, including the CONTROLS over the 1-yr study period, in major part owing to winter-storm damage. However, by April 1996 there is a significant difference between densities in the low and high treatment areas, and after this date there are no surviving Hedophyllum individuals in the high-density treatment areas. The effect on juvenile kelp plants is direct, in that the chitons eat them up. Effects on young adult plants, however, are indirect, in that the chitons damage the holdfasts resulting in greater losses to waves. Apparently, the chitons seek out protection from desiccation or waves by burrowing into and edging under the holdfasts, thus loosening their attachment to the rock. The findings of the study provide evidence for a refuge in size for Hedophyllum from one of its principal grazers. Photographs courtesy Russ Markel, University of British Columbia & Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre. NOTE1 the authors do not use fence barriers to delineate these plots; rather, they employ natural topographical features such as surge channels and outcroppings to restrict the chitons’ movements NOTE2 experimental densities are based on the original average density of Katharina in the 18 treatment areas, adjusted to 25% of this value in the “low-density” treatments and to 75% in the “high-density” treatments. There are 6 replicates of each of the 3 treatments NOTE3 algal sporelings are highly vulnerable to grazing invertebrate herbivores and this early phase of life has been termed a “herbivory bottleneck” by marine algologists. Although the same principles applies to larvae of marine invertebrates, there seems to be no comparable “carnivory bottleneck” referred to in the literature |
|||
Research study 5 |
|||
Data on seasonal changes in levels of heat-shock proteins (Hsp704, see graph on Right) indicate that the chitons experience sublethal temperature stresses during spring and summer. Note in particular that the seasonal onset of daytime low tides occurring in mid- to late-spring is associated with increased levels of Hsp70, indicating that this may be a time of significant physiological stress for the chitons. During these stressful periods Katharina’s intertidal distribution appears to be limited by the availability of shady refugia. Note in the body-temperature graph (above Left) the marked effect that shade, whether naturally created by Hedophyllum or within the “artificial"-shade cages, has on mitigating temperature effects in Katharina. NOTE1 this canopy-forming perennial kelp delineates a specific level in the low intertidal zone of rocky beaches. So important is it in community dynamics of the shore that it has been termed a “foundation species” and an “ecologically dominant species” by various authors NOTE2 the data presentation given in the paper on numbers of chitons within each treatment over the nearly 3-yr study period is complex and is not presented here NOTE3 these are upside-down vinyl-coated wire-mesh baskets, fastened to the rock surface. Other top-less baskets, presumably accessible to birds, serve as control treatments. Baskets with vexar-mesh tops represent shade treatments to mimic the natural canopy-shading of Hedophyllum. Holes are cut in the sides of all cages at rock level to allow the chitons ingress and egress NOTE4 the expression of Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) is commonly used to assess stress in animals resulting from physical factors such as temperature, UV light, and other stresses. HSP70 is actually a complex of these proteins but, for convenience, is expressed collectively as “Hsp70” by the authors. More on HSPs in the ODYSSEY can be found at LEARN ABOUT ABALONES & RELATIVES: PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY: HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS, and LEARN ABOUT MUSSELS: LIFE IN THE INTERTIDAL ZONE: HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS |
|||
Research study 6 |
|||
NOTE1 larvae are lecithotrophic and are able to settle within a few days of hatching NOTE2 individuals are tagged by inserting plastic zip ties through the mantle edge bearing numbered fish tags. Tag retention is poor, with only 14% being found after 6mo NOTE3 predatory species tested include sea stars Evasterias troschelii, Pisaster ochraceus, and Pycnopodia helianthoides, and crabs Pugettia producta and Cancer productus
Gumboot chiton Cryptochiton stelleri |
|||
| RETURN TO TOP | |||